Most companies claim they want enthusiastic, engaged employees β and with good reason. Employee engagement and financial performance are connected. AΒ recent study by Aon Hewitt, for example, found that companies with high levels of engagement outperformed the stock market in 2010.
And yetΒ Gallup researchΒ indicates that more than 70 percent of employees in the typical company are βnot engagedβ or βactively disengaged.β
Whatβs the reason for this failure? In my view, it boils down to a startling disconnect between how companies try to promote engagement and what truly inspires and motivates employees.
At most companies, the human resources department βownsβ and measures engagement. It issues a lengthy annual survey, asking employees a withering barrage of questions β everything from your overall satisfaction to the adequacy of prescription benefits to whether you have a βbest friendβ at work. The resulting report, issued after lengthy analysis, leads to an improved benefits program, βsupervisor coaching,β or other initiatives run by staff at the center.
This approach is just like the way most companies used to deal with customers. Marketing or customer service departments owned customer satisfaction, relied on traditional staff-directed tools (such as training programs) to improve it, and gauged their success through old-style satisfaction surveys.
In recent years, however, leading companies such asΒ ZapposΒ and Apple have led a revolution in creating great customer experiences:
- They make wowing customers a priority forΒ everyΒ frontline employee, not just a central team at headquarters.
- Instead of infrequent satisfaction studies, they ask their customers for feedbackΒ all the time.
These companies typically give their customers short, quick surveys. They promptly distribute the scores and verbatim responses to frontline reps and supervisors, who follow up right away with unhappy customers, fixing the problems wherever possible. And these companies build closed-loop learning into their daily operations so that theyβre constantly improving.
These efforts earn these companies deep, long-lasting customer loyalty. Their customers not only spend more, stay longer, and recommend the company to their friends, but they also contribute ideas for improvement because they believe the company values their feedback.
So, suppose you applied that same methodology to building employee engagement. What would you do differently?
For one thing,Β youβd conduct short surveysΒ that respect your employeesβ time and ask only the few questions that yield the most important insights. You would do this often enough to generate a steady stream of information about engagement levels and ideas for improvement. JetBlue,Β whose employees I wrote about in my last post, sends a survey ninety days after an employeeβs start date and every year thereafter. Apple surveys its employees every few months.
And instead of delegating the effort to HR, youβd make employee engagement a top priority for frontline managers and employees themselves, with built-in procedures for closed-loop learning.
In fact, youβd take away the crutch of thinking that βsomeone elseβ is taking care of it, placing responsibility squarely and undeniably on the shoulders of frontline managers. Thatβs how itβs done atΒ Apple stores. After each survey wave, store managers review the data for their store. Employee focus groups identify key themes and issues, and employee teams help develop solutions, which they present to store management. There is no waiting for analysis and recommendations from some central team. By the time the next survey comes around in a few months, managers and store employees know whether their solutions have had the desired effect.
It shouldnβt be surprising that the same basic techniques for earning customer loyalty also work with employees. At their core, both efforts depend on treating people with dignity and respect. Both require real-time learning. Both address the relationship in a human way, not just as a transaction or piece of data.
And, as it happens, they reinforce each other. Employees learn how to wow customers and feel great when they do. Customers love the experience. Itβs a virtuous cycle β something we call theΒ Promoter FlywheelΒ β and it leads to great financial performance.
Conventional approaches to employee engagement tend to focus on overall workplace improvements and benefits because those things can be directed by staff from the center. Theyβre the βeasyβ things to do. Obviously, theyβre important: A safe and pleasant work environment, fair compensation, and the tools needed to do the job are table stakes for employee satisfaction.
But what you really want isnβt just satisfied employees, itβsΒ passionateΒ employees β people who love working for your company, love your products and services, and love wowing customers. You build that kind of advocacy by creating a real commitment to enriching your customersβ lives, giving employees the tools and freedom to delight customers, and helping them see and hear the effects of their actions.
Original article page can be found at:Β https://hbr.org/2011/10/engage-employees-using-custome
Rob MarkeyΒ is a partner and director at Bain & Company and the founder of the firmβs Global Customer Strategy and Marketing practice. He is a coauthor of the bookΒ The Ultimate Question 2.0: How Net Promoter Companies Thrive in a Customer-Driven World (HBR Press) and is the host of the Net Promoter System podcast. He is based in New York.
LEAD’s Comment:
Based on the article, here are several tactics HR managers should use to engage employees:
- Prioritize employee engagement at every level, not just in HR. Engagement should be a top responsibility for frontline managers.
- Implement short, frequent surveys that respect employeesβ time and offer valuable insights into engagement levels and areas for improvement. Try out Pulse Survey from LEAD.bot
- Feedback from these surveys should be shared promptly with managers and employees, who can then act on the information.
- Establish a culture of closed-loop learning where immediate action is taken on feedback, and its impact is measured in subsequent surveys.
- Encourage employees to participate actively in identifying issues and developing solutions, which can increase their sense of ownership and engagement. Many teams use LEAD.bot to pair employees up or match them into smaller discussion groups to develop this skill.
- Don’t just focus on overall workplace improvements and benefits. While these are important, they often only lead to satisfied employees, not passionate ones.
- Foster a culture where employees are encouraged and equipped to “wow” customers, and where the positive feedback from employees is shared and celebrated. You can use LEAD.bot’ Watercooler feature to post such topics in Slack channels or Teams in Microsoft Teams.
- Create a company commitment to enrich customersβ lives, which can build employee advocacy and passion.
The overall goal is to create an environment where employees are not just satisfied but are passionate about their work, the company, and the company’s mission.